Seleziona la tua lingua
English (Global) 
Français (France) 
Deutsch (DACH) 
Dutch (Nederlands) 
English (United States) 
English (Canada) 
French (Canada) 
Impact investing in listed equities is often treated as the hard case compared with private markets. Critics argue that buying shares in the secondary market creates little ‘additionality’, since no new capital is being provided. That argument overlooks the additionality that comes from constructive engagement with portfolio companies, aimed at measurably better outcomes against clearly defined goals.
A wealth firm can apply rigorous governance to every investment, fund or strategy that it offers and still, over time, end up with a platform that no one would deliberately build today.
A bfinance poll of EU insurers points to a material increase in CLO debt allocations through 2027.
Investors considering today’s expanded landscape of semi-liquid or evergreen vehicles for private market investing face a key challenge.
The ground beneath the idea of portfolio resilience has shifted in the ‘turbulent twenties’ – how can allocators adjust?
Altri articoli...
- Private credit and the asset allocation challenge
- bfinance Platform: real assets, UK open-ended property funds in five charts
- Investor Spotlight: PGB - can impact investing become the default setting for private markets portfolios?
- Investor Spotlight: KWAP - navigating technological shifts in quant equities
Pagina 1 di 16
ISCRIZIONE ALLA NEWSLETTER
Ricevi gli ultimi approfondimenti di bfinance
Iscriviti alla nostra newsletter e ricevi gli ultimi approfondimenti di bfinance via e-mail.
Latest Insights
